Dave's Patent Content Factory
Applications
Terms
Paragraphs
Claims
Docket
Logout
About
Term #2,271
Edit Term
Training objective
View
List Terms
Delete
Claim Term
Application
2380.2.01
US-20150012794-A1
US-20150205664-A1
US-20100023800-A1
US-8737141-A1
US-10157004-B2
US10007433A1
US-9159419-B2
US-10114589-A1
US-10134728-A1
US-20200065270-A1
US-10637533-B2
US-9927986-A1
US-8380915-A1
US-9159419-A1
US-9208071-A1
US-20200098728-A1
US-10643676-A1
US-10468073-B2
US-10283200-A1
US-10461965-B1
US-20130279232-A1
US-8892980-B2
US9632727A1
US10558561A1
US20100023800A1
US7230213A1
OPT-9
FLO-2
FLO-5PROV
ONSO3175(B) - Onsemi378
ONSO3305US - Onsemi346
GTS-3DES
FLO-4
US8762658B2
US8533406B2
US9632727B2
KMN-1PROV
PAT-2
PER-8 PROV
PER-9 PROV
INS-4PROV
HAR-1
CES-16
NXT-5PROV NXT-5, 6, 7, 8
IPP-0051-US14 cross roads
FLO-7PROV
IMI-5PROV
IPP-0050-US35 nextremity
VIL-12
OPT-13
TOY-1
US10998041B1
FSP1845
US6559866B2
Placeholder App
PER-10
KBR-1 1400.2.623
PER-13PROV
PAT-3
US20030023453
RMS-1DES
SMG-1DES
FLO-5
US10318495
US10133662B2
PER-11
US20140066758
VIL-17
PER-17
JBR-1
PER-12
US11056880
US11302645
US20210407565
US11081191
PON-1PROV, 2PROV, 3PROV
PER-33
RMT-1PROV
PER-32
PER-34
MCC-1
FLO-10
PER-14
PER-19
PER-22
PER-18
PER-24
TMC-PAT-1
DAR-2
PER-23
TMC-PAT-4
PER-16
PER-4 DIV1
PER-20
PER-21
BRT-PAT-1
TMC-PAT-5
TMC-PAT-6PROV
BRT-PAT-2-PROV
71212.157.USU1
FPR-PAT-1-PROV
71212.158.USP1
RMT-1
DAR-1PROV
DAR-2PROV
PON-1PROV
PON-2PROV
PON-3PROV
PER-18PROV
TMC-1PROV
TMC-2PROV
PER-13PCT
PER-13
PER-16PROV
PER-14PROV
PER-34PROV
TMC-4PROV
TMC-3
PAS-1PROV
VEH-1
PER-29DES
TEST.001
E2E-TEST.001
TEST-001
TEST-002
TEST-003
TEST-004
ZED006
FSP1011
GAV-PAT-1-PROV
App Docket
Created Date
Full Desc
"Training objective" refers to a defined goal, criterion, or set of conditions used to guide the learning process of an artificial intelligence model, machine learning system, or neural network during training. Synonyms for “training objective” may include optimization goal, learning criterion, loss function target, model supervision directive, or the like. The training objective may quantify how well the model performs a task and may direct the adjustment of model parameters to minimize or maximize a defined measure of performance. In some embodiments, the training objective may incorporate one or more performance metrics, similarity comparisons, classification accuracy measures, or quality-based evaluations. In the context of editorial content generation, the training objective may include comparing a machine-generated editorial comment for a manuscript to a human-generated editorial comment for the same manuscript using a similarity metric such as cosine similarity, thereby encouraging the model to produce outputs that align semantically with human-provided output. The training objective may also include additional components such as language fluency, coherence, informativeness, or compliance with editorial guidelines. The training objective may be used in supervised, semi-supervised, or reinforcement learning workflows and may be updated or tuned over time to reflect evolving editorial standards, reviewer preferences, or corpus characteristics. In certain embodiments, a composite training objective may be employed. A composite training objective refers to a training objective that includes two or more individual objective components that are optimized jointly, such as a combination of classification accuracy, semantic similarity, language quality, or rule-based compliance. The individual components of a composite training objective may be combined through weighting, aggregation, or other optimization strategies, and may be adjusted over time to balance competing editorial goals or performance considerations.
Submit