Dave's Patent Content Factory
Applications
Terms
Paragraphs
Claims
Docket
Logout
About
Term #2,264
Edit Term
Quality assessment
View
List Terms
Delete
Claim Term
Application
2380.2.01
US-20150012794-A1
US-20150205664-A1
US-20100023800-A1
US-8737141-A1
US-10157004-B2
US10007433A1
US-9159419-B2
US-10114589-A1
US-10134728-A1
US-20200065270-A1
US-10637533-B2
US-9927986-A1
US-8380915-A1
US-9159419-A1
US-9208071-A1
US-20200098728-A1
US-10643676-A1
US-10468073-B2
US-10283200-A1
US-10461965-B1
US-20130279232-A1
US-8892980-B2
US9632727A1
US10558561A1
US20100023800A1
US7230213A1
OPT-9
FLO-2
FLO-5PROV
ONSO3175(B) - Onsemi378
ONSO3305US - Onsemi346
GTS-3DES
FLO-4
US8762658B2
US8533406B2
US9632727B2
KMN-1PROV
PAT-2
PER-8 PROV
PER-9 PROV
INS-4PROV
HAR-1
CES-16
NXT-5PROV NXT-5, 6, 7, 8
IPP-0051-US14 cross roads
FLO-7PROV
IMI-5PROV
IPP-0050-US35 nextremity
VIL-12
OPT-13
TOY-1
US10998041B1
FSP1845
US6559866B2
Placeholder App
PER-10
KBR-1 1400.2.623
PER-13PROV
PAT-3
US20030023453
RMS-1DES
SMG-1DES
FLO-5
US10318495
US10133662B2
PER-11
US20140066758
VIL-17
PER-17
JBR-1
PER-12
US11056880
US11302645
US20210407565
US11081191
PON-1PROV, 2PROV, 3PROV
PER-33
RMT-1PROV
PER-32
PER-34
MCC-1
FLO-10
PER-14
PER-19
PER-22
PER-18
PER-24
TMC-PAT-1
DAR-2
PER-23
TMC-PAT-4
PER-16
PER-4 DIV1
PER-20
PER-21
BRT-PAT-1
TMC-PAT-5
TMC-PAT-6PROV
BRT-PAT-2-PROV
71212.157.USU1
FPR-PAT-1-PROV
71212.158.USP1
RMT-1
DAR-1PROV
DAR-2PROV
PON-1PROV
PON-2PROV
PON-3PROV
PER-18PROV
TMC-1PROV
TMC-2PROV
PER-13PCT
PER-13
PER-16PROV
PER-14PROV
PER-34PROV
TMC-4PROV
TMC-3
PAS-1PROV
VEH-1
PER-29DES
TEST.001
E2E-TEST.001
TEST-001
TEST-002
TEST-003
TEST-004
ZED006
FSP1011
GAV-PAT-1-PROV
App Docket
Created Date
Full Desc
"Quality assessment" refers to a form of assessment that evaluates the degree to which a subject, such as a manuscript, system output, data set, model result, or process outcome, satisfies predefined or context-sensitive standards of quality. Synonyms for “quality assessment” may include quality evaluation, quality review, performance appraisal, standard compliance check, or the like. A quality assessment may be based on one or more criteria such as clarity, completeness, accuracy, consistency, originality, readability, technical soundness, recency criteria, or alignment with domain-specific norms or publisher guidelines. The criteria used may be fixed, adaptive, or learned from data. A quality assessment may be conducted by a human evaluator, an automated system, an artificial intelligence module, or a combination thereof. In artificial intelligence systems, a quality assessment may include computing similarity metrics, analyzing coherence, fluency, or informativeness of generated text, or determining whether the output meets specified objectives. The results of a quality assessment may include a rating, score, rank, flag, editorial comment, or the like, and may inform subsequent decision-making or further processing steps. The quality assessment may be domain-specific and applied within workflows involving content moderation, peer review, machine-generated text evaluation, or other review processes. (Defined in conjunction with ChatGPT 4o Version, July 15, 2025.)
Submit